Louis Vuitton Original

NY Times Buries Dodd's Filibuster Threat Victory senator taking a successful stand against a rogue White House administration and its spineless collaborators in Congress? If you're The Times, it's something akin to a whisper.

(Editor's Note: If you tried to comment today and received a message about triggering the spam filter some people got this, some didn't I apologize for your troubles. Typepad, which hosts this site, has installed a new, overly aggressive spam filter. Rest assured I can now access this filter and publish anyone's comment that incorrectly winds up there. So post comments as you normally would. If you don't see yours right away, you will shortly. Thanks for your patience and for contributing to the conversation.) UPDATE: Commenter EastFallowfield left this earlier today: A29 in the Times doesn't mean it's buried. It's not front page, but the first x amount of pages after page 1 are International News. The National louis vuitton neverfull look alike news starts in the middle somewhere, and this time of year there are a ton of fullpage or other large ads filling up many pages of the A section. It was right in the middle of all the pages on politics and such. The Times is no "Thinkprogress" or Kos, but if it's not on the front page then it was pretty much where it was supposed to be in their world. I responded to it in the comments section and thought the points made helped to further clarify the irresponsibility of The Times' editorial decision, so I'm reposting my response here, too: EastFallowField, thanks for your comment. But I think you're giving The Times far too much credit here. First, there's no valid reason why this story didn't make the front page. That said, here's a deeper examination of its specific placement: When the Times thinks a story is important but is short on space, it sometimes puts a photo of the story on the cover that calls out the page number inside (as it did for the large Darfur peace rally in Central Park a year and a half ago). Or the Times will highlight a story on the front page's "Inside" section. What were some of the stories on the "Inside" section that beat out the Dodd news yesterday? 2: "NBC Late Shows to Resume"; 4: "Why the Long Face?" (about a new book that helps you diagnose what's ailing your pet dog, cat, ferret, etc.); 7: "A Winning Influence" (a successful all Indian high school basketball team in Oklahoma). In addition to the "Inside" section (located on the cover), there is also the "News Summary" area located on the following page (A2). This section also serves to highlight important articles inside the paper, from International, National, New York/Region, Business, Science, Health Fitness, and Editorial. This section calls out five National stories. The Dodd news wasn't there either. What's one of the stories that was? 3: "Churches Battle Witchcraft." I wish I were making that up. Unfortunately, this was yet another story The Times deemed more critical than Dodd's victory. Finally, the first page of the National section on that day was A24; the Dodd news, as mentioned, was located on A29. That's six pages into the National news section. While it should've been on the cover, that it didn't make the first page of louis vuitton purses estrela the National section and didn't appear until six pages deep into it, only further underscores the absurdity of The Times' editorial decision and confirms the story was indeed buried. Moreover, please note two of the three National stories trumping Dodd's victory on the first page of the section the aforementioned witchcraft article: "A Midnight Service Helps African Immigrants Combat Demons" and this more pressing national news item: "San Francisco's Mayor Proposes Fee on Sales of Sugary Soft Drinks." Why does anyone find this unusual? It like trying to make sense of Joe Klein LYING to his readers and TIME going along with it, supporting the deception. This is America media. They are ALL corporate louis vuitton leather agenda whores, they do NOT care about this country only theirs and their friends money and power, that is all. Americas future, the constitution is horseshit in these people eyes. Remember Howard Dean threatended to reduce media consolidation and what happened to him? Now what do you think would be happening to Dodd right now if he were actually in a position to win the nomination? hah You would have every outlet attacking him today talking about how he has killed the democratic party and is endangering "the troops The only one not hammering Dodd today would be Chris Matthews and that is only because he is still spitting all over himself due to his sick, sick Hillary fetish. EastFallowfield, thanks for your comment. But I think you giving The Times far too much credit here. First, there no valid reason why this story didn make the front page. That said, here a deeper examination of its specific placement: When the Times thinks a story is important but is short on space, it sometimes puts a photo of the story on the cover that calls out the page number inside (as it did for the large Darfur peace rally in Central Park a year and a half ago).

Or the Times will highlight a story on the front page "Inside" section. What were some of the stories louis vuitton alma long on the "Inside" section that beat out the Dodd news yesterday? 2: "NBC Late Shows to Resume"; 4: "Why the Long Face?" (about a new book that helps you diagnose what ailing your pet dog, cat, ferret, etc.); 7: "A Winning Influence" (a successful all Indian high school basketball team in Oklahoma).